DVD Movie Guide @ dvdmg.com Awards & Recommendations at Amazon.com.
.
Review Archive:  # | A-C | D-F | G-I | J-L | M-O | P-R | S-U | V-Z | Viewer Ratings | Main
EUREKA

MOVIE INFO

Director:
Ringo Lam
Cast:
Andy Lau, Rosamund Kwan, Chien-Lien Wu
Writing Credits:
Ringo Lam, Sandy Shaw, Kwong-Yam Yip

Synopsis:
Wai Lok-yan seeks revenge for the death of his family.

MPAA:
Rated NR.

DISC DETAILS
Presentation:
Aspect Ratio: 1.85:1
Audio:
Cantonese LPCM Restored Stereo
Cantonese LPCM Unrestored Stereo
Cantonese DTS-HD MA 5.1
Subtitles:
English
Closed-captioned
Supplements Subtitles:
None

Runtime: 111 min.
Price: $39.95
Release Date: 4/29/2025

Bonus:
• Audio Commentary with Film Critic David West
• “Two Adventurers” Featurette
• Archival Interview with Screenwriter Sandy Shaw
• Trailer


PURCHASE @ AMAZON.COM

EQUIPMENT
-LG OLED65C6P 65-Inch 4K Ultra HD Smart OLED TV
-Marantz SR7010 9.2 Channel Full 4K Ultra HD AV Surround Receiver
-Panasonic DMP-BDT220P Blu-Ray Player
-Chane A2.4 Speakers
-SVS SB12-NSD 12" 400-watt Sealed Box Subwoofer


RELATED REVIEWS


The Adventurers [Blu-Ray] (1995)

Reviewed by Colin Jacobson (April 21, 2025)

After years as a director in Hong Kong, Ringo Lam followed peers such as John Woo to the bright lights of Hollywood for 1996’s Jean-Claude Van Damme actionfest Maximum Risk. With 1995’s The Adventurers, we get the last flick he made in Asia prior to this shift in location.

In his youth, Wai Lok-yan (uncredited urchin) saw his parents killed during the Cambodian Civil War. Yan’s father (Philip Ko) worked for the CIA and his compatriot Ray Lui (Paul Chun) murdered him and his mother.

As an adult (Andy Lau), Yan strives for revenge against Ray, who is now a wealthy arms dealer. This takes Yan on a dark journey to satisfy his desire for vengeance.

Lam didn’t fail as a Hollywood filmmaker, but he didn’t find much success either. While Maximum Risk did okay, his subsequent US projects flopped and got terrible reviews.

Actually, Lam worked in both the US and Hong Kong through 2003’s In Hell, his last American flick. Lam wouldn’t do much after that, as he only directed a few more Asian features prior to his untimely death in 2018.

As far as I recall, I never saw any of Lam’s Hollywood directorial efforts. I did watch 1999’s horrifyingly bad Dennis Rodman actioner Simon Sez - which Lam produced – but if I ever took in Maximum Risk, In Hell or 2001’s Replicant<, I forgot them years ago.

Does Adventurers compel me to check out more of Lam’s filmography? No, as it provides a surprisingly dull experience.

Though I probably shouldn’t dock the movie points for its completely unrepresentative title, I do, as The Adventurers implies something entirely different from this revenge-oriented action flick. I thought perhaps the movie simply suffered from a bad choice by those who released it in the US, but if Google Translate got it right, the film’s Chinese title comes out as Great Adventurer, and that doesn’t describe the movie any better than The Adventurers.

Whatever we call the film, it ends up as a strangely sluggish and dull affair. For a tale that relies on the passions of its lead, this one seems oddly slow and aimless.

Though Adventurers does launch with lots of drama. After we watch little Yan suffer family tragedy, we meet his adult incarnation as a veteran military pilot.

I presume he showed the stability needed to ascend to such a position. However, on our first encounter with adult Yan, he suffers from such severe PTSD related to his parents’ death that he nearly crashes his jet.

Yeah, I guess the movie intends to convey that Yan just heard troubling revelations, not that he’d remained constantly obsessed with the details of the tragic events for the prior 20 years. However, the filmmakers don’t spell this out well, and one would think a trained airman would possess the mental toughness that would allow him to stay cool in the midst of military exercises.

At least this scene brings some drama, a concept in low supply through most of Adventurers. Oh, the movie pops to life at times, and after a very slow start, it almost kicks into gear around its midpoint.

Unfortunately, it soon returns to its slumber, a factor exacerbated by its use of a clumsy love triangle. A revenge action flick doesn’t need sappy romantic melodrama, and these elements make a tepid tale even less compelling.

Even the violent set pieces rarely ignite. As implied, we get one sequence mid-film that shows promise, but nothing the rest of the way seems especially vivid.

Lam brings a surprisingly “meat and potatoes” directorial vision to Adventurers. Not that I expect all Hong Kong filmmakers to resemble John Woo, but I figured Lam would muster more flair and visual punch than we find.

All these criticisms aside, I don’t think Adventurers flops, as it provides enough intriguing action scenes to make sure it doesn’t lose us. However, this ends up as a sluggish revenge drama that sputters too much of the time.


The Disc Grades: Picture B/ Audio D+/ Bonus B-

The Adventurers appears in an aspect ratio of on this Blu-ray Disc. Though a little erratic at times, this usually turned into a solid image.

For the most part, sharpness worked fine. Some shots seemed a little loose, but overall definition satisfied.

No issues with jagged edges or moiré effects materialized, and I saw no edge haloes. Grain seemed reasonably natural, and I witnessed no source defects.

Colors leaned natural, albeit with a slightly pale side. Even though the hues could’ve seemed more robust, they still appeared more than adequate.

Blacks felt largely deep, while low-light shots offered appealing delineation. Nothing here dazzled but the visuals appeared pretty positive.

The Blu-ray comes with two separate LPCM stereo options – one “restored”, one “unrestored” – as well as a DTS-HD MA 5.1 presentation. I flipped among the options as I watched. What differences did I hear between restored and unrestored “stereo”?

First off, neither showed any indications of actual discrete two-channel audio. Both felt entirely monaural, though not always centered, as the track could lean left or right at times.

Still, if the viewer wanted to hear directional information, it didn’t appear during the “stereo” tracks. Both showed identical “imaging”.

However, quality differed, as each came with pros and cons. “Unrestored” tended to sound flat and lifeless, but it also lacked distortion.

“Restored” seemed brighter and more vibrant. However, it suffered from a lot of edginess to speech and roughness that impacted it in other ways.

I found it tough to recommend one over the other. While “restored” showed greater dynamic range, all that distortion turned into a drag. Whichever the viewer chooses, problems will ensue.

How did the 5.1 mix fare? Not really any better, unfortunately, as it suffered from its own issues.

Once again, distortion became a problem. Like “restored”, the 5.1 track displayed edgy speech, rough effects and shrill music.

If anything, these factors seemed exacerbated because the use of multiple channels meant the flawed elements became even more obvious. Spread the issues with “restored” to all five speakers and we end up with the same concerns magnified.

Whoever mastered the 5.1 mix did so at a painfully loud level, and even when I reduced the volume on my receiver, it still felt like it pushed the envelope. Essentially it sounded like someone used the “restored” stems and cranked them to “11”.

The 5.1 track did use the various channels actively, but not in a smooth and natural manner. Instead, information popped up in vaguely logical spots but not in a way that made the elements seem realistic.

Granted, some terrible foley work didn’t help, but even without that, I thought the soundscape placed components in various spots willy-nilly. Though these choices seemed vaguely accurate, the end result gave us a soundfield that failed to involve the viewer in the action.

Indeed, the decisions made the movie less intriguing, mainly because the 5.1 felt so phony and contrived. It could’ve been worse, but it sure didn’t satisfy.

That said, none of the three audio choices worked. I’d probably pick “unrestored” as the best option just because it lacked the persistent roughness of the other two, but regard that as a lukewarm “recommendation” at best.

A few extras flesh out the disc, and we get an audio commentary from film critic David West. He delivers a running, screen-specific discussion of story/characters, genre domains, cast and crew, production notes, and his thoughts about the movie.

While West often gives us useful details, he also tends to stick with “glorified IMDB profile” a lot of the time. That doesn’t make this a bad track, but it focuses more on cast/crew histories than I’d like.

Though West does note that it seems tough to find much concrete info about the shoot, which seems weird given that Adventurers came out only 30 years ago and presumably many of the folks involved remain alive. I’m sure he tried his best to locate production details, but it remains perplexing that these facts appear elusive.

With Two Adventurers, we find a 21-minute, 26-second featurette. It brings notes from Asian Cinema Journal editor Gary Bettinson.

The program covers Hong Kong cinema in general and the careers of director Ringo Lam and actor Andy Lau. Bettinson delivers a succinct overview.

Writing for the Dark-Faced God goes for 14 minutes, 26 seconds. It provides an archival interview with screenwriter Sandy Shaw.

She discusses aspects of her career as well as her work on Adventurers. Shaw offers some useful details.

By the way, although the package’s description of this as an “archival” interview seems to imply “old”, the high quality of the visuals indicates it can’t have been shot too long ago.

The disc concludes with a trailer.

As a tale of revenge, The Adventurers lacks real passion. Oh, it makes its lead seem obsessed, but the movie’s lackluster pacing ensures the drama never really takes flight. The Blu-ray comes with fairly positive visuals, a variety of problematic audio options, and a handful of informative supplements. Nothing about Adventurers makes it a genuinely bad movie, but it also fails to turn into anything memorable.

.
Review Archive:  # | A-C | D-F | G-I | J-L | M-O | P-R | S-U | V-Z | Main