As one who never read any of the books on which they based the films, I find it difficult to know who to credit or blame while I watch The Lord of the Rings. I hear that Peter Jackson’s movies remain faithful to the Tolkien novels, so I suppose that means that when I find something in the story that I don’t like, the fault lies with old JRR.

That became an issue as I watched The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers, the second in the trilogy. While the movie offered a generally intriguing and stimulating piece, it suffered from a decidedly lackluster plot that made it less involving than its predecessor, The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring.

Towers picks up literally where the last film ended. With the Fellowship of the Ring splintered, the hobbits Frodo (Elijah Wood) and Sam (Sean Astin) continue their journey to return the One Ring to Mordor, where they plan to destroy it. They quickly discover an unwanted guest in Gollum (Andy Serkis), the corrupted prior possessor of the One Ring who badly wants it back from them. Sam wants to leave Gollum behind, but Frodo takes pity on him and lets him accompany them on their journey. It appears that Gollum – also known by his original name Smeagol - can help lead the lost explorers to Mordor, so he serves a need.

While all this occurs, evil Saruman the White (Christopher Lee) prepares for the war for Middle-earth. He opens with an assault on Rohan. Saruman poisoned the mind of King Theoden (Bernard Hill), who now solely follows the advice of his wicked advisor Wormtongue (Brad Dourif). When the king’s nephew Eomer (Karl Urban) speaks for the good of the kingdom, Wormtongue banishes him. Eomer takes an army loyal to Rohan to try to protect it.

In the meantime, elf Legolas (Orlando Bloom), dwarf Gimli (John Rhys-Davies), and human Aragorn (Viggo Mortensen) all chase after kidnapped hobbits Merry (Dominic Monaghan) and Pippin (Billy Boyd). Taken by the nasty warriors called the Uruk-hai, the riders from Rohan slaughter the latter group; apparently our hobbits buy it in the assault.

When Aragorn et al. encounter Eomer and his group, they learn of the apparent death of their hobbit buddies. However, Aragorn uses his superior tracking skills to establish that the hobbits actually made it out and fled into Fangorn Forest. We then see that they ran into that area and encountered a group of living trees called the Ents. Treebeard (voiced by Rhys-Davies) rescues them but shows them little affection. He treats them suspiciously and takes them to meet the white wizard. But it’s not Saruman; instead, it turns out that rumors of Gandalf’s (Ian McKellen) demise were exaggerated. We learn how he survived and then see as Gandalf catch up with Aragorn, Gimli and Legolas. He rounds them up to head out and deal with the coming war. Gandalf leaves the hobbits with the Ents to keep them safe, and they learn more about that culture.

Essentially the film follows these three different plots. Merry and Pippin hang out with the Ents, who eventually play their own part in the war. Frodo tries to get in touch with the Smeagol side of Gollum and we witness personality conflict inside the latter. In addition, Frodo gets more and more poisoned by the Ring and has to deal with his own issues. Gandalf, Aragon and the others go off to take part in the burgeoning battle. They come to Rohan and try to free the king’s mind from the clutches of Saruman before they launch into battle. Aragorn also sees some romantic possibilities with the king’s niece Eowyn (Miranda Otto), which leads him to conflict due to his prior commitment to the elf Arwen (Liv Tyler).

Towers gains in stature and power when viewed alongside the trilogy’s concluding chapter, The Return of the King. As the middle chapter, Towers lacks the plot set-up and exposition that helped make Fellowship intriguing, and it also features neither a proper beginning nor an end. It just begins, and we get no explanation about what came in the first film.

That means neophyte viewers will definitely not want to check out Towers unless they’ve already seen Fellowship. The world of Tolkien is dense and confusing enough even with some foreknowledge; I can’t imagine how lost you’d be if you didn’t have a viewing or three of Fellowship under your belt before you checked out Towers.

I don’t regard the lack of exposition in Towers as a fault, though. Actually, I give Jackson a lot of credit because he trusted that the audience would know their stuff in advance. Any quick synopsis at the opening of Towers would have been insufficient to cover matters anyway, so he treated things appropriately.

As I mentioned at the start, when I do find fault with Towers, I can’t be sure if I should blame Jackson or Tolkien. My two main complaints relate to the lack of proper story and the absence of much character delineation. I regard the former as the less problematic of the pair. Indeed, my concerns are probably overstated, for it’s not like Towers has no plot. After the dense exposition of Fellowship, it probably became inevitable that the second chapter would seem thinner in comparison. On its own, however, we can see that a lot happens in Towers; it simply lacks the same broad scope of the first film.

The second issue is a bigger one to me. Towers scatters the characters we came to know and love in the first film, and that means it lacks some of the cohesion of its predecessor. The main problem stems from my impression that the two pairs of hobbits get too little attention. Merry and Pippin feel almost like afterthoughts, and though Fellowship focused heavily on Frodo, he doesn’t get a ton to do here. His journey doesn’t progress substantially; if anything, that part of the story concentrates more on Gollum than the hobbits.

Without question, the elements that involve Aragorn and the others dominate Towers, especially since they include our only significant new characters via King Theoden and his clan. The king provides the best drawn and most effective of the new participants, but all of them seem somewhat thin. We never really get much of a feel for them and they come across mostly like a means to an end. Eowyn especially suffers in that department; the character seems to exist for no reason other than to give Aragorn cause to reconsider his relationship with Arwen.

For all the nit picking I’ve done so far, the movie remains a terrific spectacle, and it does advance the plot. It clearly sets the stage for the concluding chapter, and it does so in a very solid manner.

During Fellowship, Jackson displayed a talent for rich and exciting battle pageantry, and that serves him well in the second film. Towers concentrates more heavily on that side of things; indeed, the final third of the flick comes across as little more than one big fight. The enormity and aggression of those sequences works nicely and makes Towers a satisfying action film.

Does The Two Towers live up to the standards set by The Fellowship of the Ring? No, but it does well for itself anyway. Indeed, it improves upon its predecessor in some ways. It lacks the slow and draggy parts of Fellowship, but it also seems less unified and powerful. In any case, these complaints remain minor, as Towers generally provides a very satisfying flick.

The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers appears in an aspect ratio of approximately 2.40:1 on this Blu-ray Disc. At all times, the movie looked great.

Sharpness looked terrific. At no time did I discern any instances of softness or ill-defined shots. Instead, the movie consistently came across as nicely accurate and concise. I saw no issues connected to jagged edges or shimmering, and I also detected no signs of edge enhancement. The movie lacked any examples of print flaws. I witnessed no specks, marks, or other defects during this clean and smooth presentation.

Fellowship gave us a pretty restricted palette, and the darker atmosphere of Towers meant its hues were even more subdued. The first flick featured some settings with warm tones such as the shire or the elf lands, but Towers seemed much cooler overall. Even the greenery of the Ent locales looked a bit pale. I didn’t regard this as a problem, though, since the disc clearly replicated the movie’s intended palette. The colors were appropriately vivid when necessary and seemed accurately depicted.

Black levels also came across well. Dark shots demonstrated good depth and clarity. Low-light shots were nicely displayed and seemed clear and adequately visible. Shadow was clean and tight. Given the darkness of so much of the film, those components became especially important, so their high quality was an important factor in the success of the transfer. Overall, the image of The Two Towers appeared very strong.

I also felt very pleased with the DTS-HD MA 6.1 soundtrack of The Two Towers. The soundfield appeared very active and involving. All five channels presented lots of material that kept the viewer at the center of a realistic and immersive world. Elements seemed appropriately placed and they blended together well. Flying creatures soared from location to location accurately, and other pieces popped up in their proper places too. The whole thing meshed together quite nicely, and the piece worked swimmingly. Not surprisingly, battle sequences were the most impressive, but the entire package seemed strong.

Audio quality equaled the positive nature of the soundfield. Speech was natural and distinctive, and I detected no issues connected to intelligibility or edginess. Music sounded bright and vibrant, as the score presented rich and full tones. Effects came across as accurate and concise. No problems with distortion appeared, and these elements were clean and broad. Bass response seemed excellent, as the low-end remained tight and rich. I found much to like in the terrific soundtrack of The Two Towers.

How did the picture and sound of this version compare to the theatrical DVD from 2003? Both offered fairly similar audio, though the lossless mix here was a little stronger. I thought the DTS-HD track came across as a bit more dynamic and engaging.

Visual improvements were more obvious. Though I always felt very pleased with the picture quality of the DVD, it came with the format’s restrictions. In no way could it compete with the nearly flawless visuals on display here, as the Blu-ray demonstrated stunning clarity and vivacity. This was a first-rate presentation.

The Blu-ray replicates the supplements from the 2002 DVD. Most of these appear on a second disc, but the movie platter includes a few bits as well. It contributes two trailers for Towers - one teaser, one final – as well as a Lord of the Rings trilogy “supertrailer” and videogame trailers for Aragon’s Quest and War in the North. Even though some of these bits repeat on the other platter, that’s a standard DVD, so fans will be happy to see the ads in high-def on this Blu-ray.

Over on the second disc, we open with On the Set The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers Starz Encore Special. It runs 14 minutes and offers the typical mix of movie clips, behind the scenes materials, and interviews. We get remarks from director Peter Jackson plus actors Christopher Lee, Elijah Wood, Ian McKellen, Jonathan Rhys-Davies, Billy Boyd, Dominic Monaghan, Sean Astin, Andy Serkis, Viggo Mortensen, Orlando Bloom, Karl Urban, Bernard Hill, Brad Dourif, Miranda Otto, Liv Tyler and Hugo Weaving. We learn a smidgen about some filmmaking issues like bringing Gollum and Treebeard to life, but mostly we just hear a recap of the story. “On the Set” is just your typical promotional featurette and seems totally skippable.

A more extensive program comes next. The Return to Middle-earth WB special lasts 42 minutes and 54 seconds and uses a format similar to that of the prior show. We get interview snippets with Jackson, visual effects supervisor Richard Taylor, supervising art directors Dan and Chris Hennah, cinematographer Andrew Lesnie, and actors Wood, Bloom, Otto, Tyler, Astin, Boyd, Monaghan, Mortensen, McKellen, and Serkis.

Though longer and richer than “Set”, “Return” remains promotional in nature. Make no mistake – it exists to convince us to go see Towers. Despite that orientation, it seems fairly entertaining. We don’t get a great overall look at the production, but the images from the set offer some good material, and we find a few nice glimpses of how things were done. Short pieces elucidate upon topics like sets and locations, actor training, and various extracurricular activities during the shoot. You’ll find limited amounts of real “making of” information, but it’s a breezy and interesting show overall.

Created on the set by actor Sean Astin, a short film called The Long and Short of It pops up next. It begins with a 73-second intro from Astin; the flick itself fills five minutes, 51 seconds on its own. Created with Rings stand-ins and crew – including a quick cameo from Peter Jackson - the dialogue-free movie tells the tale of a short woman and a tall man who help an average-sized dude hang a wall advertisement. It’s cute but not really very entertaining.

If you enjoyed the prior offering, check out The Making of The Long and Short of It. This eight-minute and seven-second shows us what cast and crewmembers did what jobs on Short. We also learn about the project’s genesis and see the antics on the set. It’s a somewhat tongue-in-cheek and fairly entertaining little piece.

In the section called Lordoftherings.net Featurettes, we get eight of these pieces. They run between two minutes, 49 seconds and four minutes, 41 seconds for a total of 33 minutes, 39 seconds of material. I liked the Lordoftherings.net featurettes in the Fellowship set, but these seemed a bit less compelling. They focused on the flick’s villains, the creation of its audio, theRohan capital Edoras, various creatures of Middle-earth, Gandalf the White, arms and armor, the Battle of Helm’s Deep, and Gollum.

In addition to movie clips and material from the set, we hear comments from Jackson, actors Wood, Astin, McKellen, Brad Dourif, Lee, Hill, Urban, Mortensen, Rhys-Davies, Otto, Monaghan, Boyd, Serkis, visual effects supervisor Richard Taylor, supervising sound editor/co-sound designer Ethan Van Der Ryn, producer Barrie Osborne, supervising art director Hennah, conceptual artists Alan Lee and John Howe, digital model supervisor Matt Aitken, director of animation Randy Cook, visual effects supervisor Joe Letteri, creature supervisor Eric Saindon, executive producer Mark Ordesky, stuntman Sala Baker, creature facial lead animator Bay Raitt, and co-producer Rick Porras.

A few of the featurettes seem pretty good. The one about the Middle-earth creatures offers some nice design information, and the Gollum piece elaborates on that topic well. I especially like the latter’s depiction of “before and after” shots with actor Serkis. Unfortunately, many of the featurettes come across as little more than promotional items. They tell us only a little about the making of the movie and they include too many movie snippets. The Gandalf segment was the weakest in that regard. Some good material does appear here, but overall the featurettes seem somewhat lackluster.

Remaining in the promotional vein, we get both the film’s teaser and its theatrical trailer. We also locate a whopping 16 TV Spots plus a music video for Emiliana Torrini’s “Gollum’s Song”. The latter mixes the tune with a montage of clips from the movie and some shots of the singer as she records her vocal – yawn!

The disc includes a Special Extended DVD Edition Preview. The five-minute and 14-second piece quickly discusses the additions to the film and the package’s supplements, so it’s a nice promo but nothing terribly compelling.

Next we get a Behind the Scenes Preview of The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King. This 12-minute and 33-second program mixes snippets from that film with some interviews and a few behind the scenes images. We get notes from director Jackson, producer Osborne, writer Boyens, executive producer Mark Ordesky, conceptual designer/set decorator Alan Lee, previsualization supervisor Christian Rivers, actors Mortensen, Boyd, Monaghan, Astin, Wood, Urban and Hill. It focuses on the new movie’s general thrust and some of the work done to make it. The program sets the stage acceptably well, though it mostly concentrates on filmmaking issues.

Why does the 2010 Blu-ray package include “previews” for a movie and a DVD release that came out years earlier? Because this is literally the same disc that accompanied the 2003 theatrical cut DVD for Towers. The Blu-ray just takes the existing extras and plops them in this set; there’s nothing new or different here.

Finally, a third disc offers a Digital Copy of Towers. With this, you can easily transfer the film onto a computer or portable viewing device. Live long and prosper!

While not quite as terrific as its predecessor, The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers provides a solid flick on its own. It fares best when viewed as part of a “trilogy marathon”, but it still works quite nicely in the meantime. The Blu-ray offers excellent picture and audio and includes in a fairly superficial but moderately useful roster of extras. I definitely recommend The Two Towers, as it gives us a fine continuation of the involving story, and this Blu-ray presents it in optimal fashion.

Note that the The Two Towers Blu-ray appears only as part of “The Lord of the Rings: The Motion Picture Trilogy”. The nine-disc set also includes the other two movies in the series as well as bonus materials and digital copies of the three flicks. I would assume that the Towers Blu-ray will eventually be available on its own, but as of March 2010, New Line has announced no plans to do so.

To rate this film visit the original review of LOTR: THE TWO TOWERS