Reviewed by Colin Jacobson (November 12, 2023)
Like most horror flicks, 2018’s The Nun didn’t dazzle at the box office. However, with a $22 million budget, it generated massive return on investment via its $366 million worldwide gross.
Thus the inevitable sequel: 2023’s The Nun II. Given a $268 million gross on a $38 million budget, it proved less profitable than its predecessor, but I feel certain that this still-strong return means we’ll get The Nun III at some point.
Four years after the first film’s events, we visit Tarascon France circa 1956. During his daily rounds, Father Noiret (Pascal Aubert) mysteriously raises into the air, catches fire and burns to death.
Unsurprisingly, this creates concern. Novitiate Sister Irene (Taissa Farmiga) dealt with a demonic force previously, so she comes to Tarascon to fight evil once again.
“Religious figure travels to confront supernatural evil” offers a concept that dates back many years. I won’t claim to know the first movies that explored the notion, but I suspect 1973’s classic The Exorcist offers the most famous example of the genre.
Over the past 50 years, moviegoers found innumerable efforts in this domain. Nun II just becomes another in that long chain.
The 2018 Nun actually offered a spinoff from the Conjuring series. Those also gave us movies in which the main characters visited various domains to investigate evil.
Given the well-worn nature of the genre, the question becomes whether or not Nun II finds anything fresh to say – or at least manages reasonable scares. In my opinion… not really.
Because I felt the 2018 Nun created a dull stab at horror, I can’t claim the uninspiring nature of the sequel comes as a surprise. Nonetheless, the basic premise offers promise, so the filmmakers’ inability to do anything interesting with the end product makes it a letdown.
Sometimes I feel like the proverbial broken record when I discuss modern horror movies, as I tend to find the same flaws. Too many of these films come light on real terror and rely on cheap “jump scares” to get a reaction from the audience.
That becomes the case with Nun II. It traffics in standard tropes and struggles to find a personality of its own.
This means we wind up with many shots of characters who meander into dark/gloomy settings. After seemingly interminable attempts to build tension, the inevitable “jolt moments” emerge.
None of this works to create actual scares or drama. The “lather, rinse, repeat” nature of the framework just makes the whole enterprise tiresome before long.
It doesn’t help that Nun II fails to develop interesting characters. A new role – American novice Sister Debra (Storm Reid) – offers some intrigue due to her backstory.
However, the film does little to explore this topic and Sister Irene also doesn’t proceed down any compelling paths. Instead, the nuns just remain pawns in the overall plot.
If we really consider that Nun II has a plot. The movie really feels more like a collection of creepy boo scenes cobbled together around a loose narrative than anything more concise.
Nun II offers a professional production and I could point out worse horror movies. Nonetheless, it lacks inspiration and ends up as a slow, uncompelling attempt at a frightfest.
Footnote: a brief tag scene that ties to the Conjuring films appears early in the end credits.