Reviewed by Colin Jacobson (October 4, 2022)
When Paranormal Activity became a surprise hit in 2009, it quickly spawned a sequel via 2010’s Paranormal Activity 2. Since that one earned bucketloads of money as well, 2011 inevitably brought Paranormal Activity 3.
Activity 3 brought in more box office dollars than its two predecessors, so it continued the financial fun for the studio. With this one, we get formal prequel to the events of those films.
Set in 1988, we meet sisters Katie (Chloe Csengery) and Kristi (Jessica Tyler Brown). They live with their mom Julie (Lauren Bittner) and her boyfriend Dennis (Chris Smith), a wedding videographer.
When weird actions arise, Kristi claims her imaginary friend “Toby” causes mischief in the house. When some of these events push credulity, Dennis sets up cameras in the house to record the shenanigans and determine if something supernatural exists.
As I mentioned when I reviewed Activity 2, I think the franchise made a major misstep when it decided to become “The Katie Saga”. Activity 2 offered a minor prequel of its own, as it took place a few months prior to the first film’s events and introduced Kristi to the overall narrative.
I still think an anthology approach would’ve made more sense, and the franchise did eventually go that way. The attempts to retrofit a long legend related to Katie and her family feels forced and silly.
Of course, given how little I cared for the first two movies, this couldn’t become a fatal flaw. They seemed so dull that the franchise really couldn’t go downhill from there.
That said, I did prefer Activity 2 to the initial film, and I like Activity 3 best of the opening trio. While many of the same flaws that dogged its predecessors remain, Activity 3 at least works a little harder to offer an actual story.
This stems from the Dennis character, as he acts to motivate a lot of what we see – literally, since without his gig as a wedding photographer, there’d be less plausibility behind the notion that someone could set up multiple cameras in the house. As I will discuss later, Activity 3 jettisons verisimilitude in many ways, at least it recognizes that few 1988 households enjoyed one video camera, much less a bunch of them or surveillance cams.
In addition, Dennis acts as a detective of sorts. In the first two films, the characters tended to simply react to events, whereas here Dennis becomes more proactive as he investigates the potentially supernatural elements.
The presence of “Toby” gives the movie more of a narrative thrust as well. During the prior flicks, bizarre shenanigans occurred without any form of obvious presence, so though he remains unseen, “Toby” at least offers the audience a semi-tangible horror character.
All of this creates a film with more tension and actual plot movement than its predecessors. Those often felt like long stretches of monotony punctuated by jump scares, whereas Activity 3 advocates real story points on a more frequent basis.
Does any of this make Activity 3 an honest to God good movie? Not really, mainly because it still relies so heavily on those “boo moments”.
Virtually all of the “scares” in the first two flicks stemmed from sudden jolts, and that remains the emphasis for Activity 3. We get very few moments of organic terror, as the movie needs its jumps to provoke a response.
That said, Activity 3 builds a sense of tension that its predecessors lack. As the story develops, we get some actual anxiety along the way, a factor that rarely played into the dull and flat first two movies.
On its own, I won’t call Activity 3 an especially involving film, as it relies on too many horror tropes. However, I think it clearly becomes the best of the series to that point, for it manages superior story and character development without as many boring stretches.