Reviewed by Colin Jacobson (February 10, 2026)
In general, I think it seems like a bad idea for a director to work with his or her spouse in a film, as this feels likely to arouse concerns of favoritism and other conflicts. However, it turned out fine for John Cassavetes and Gena Rowlands, with 1974’s A Woman Under the Influence right in the middle of the 10 films they made toward over their 35 years of marriage.
Utility crew foreman Nick Longhetti (Peter Falk) and housewife Mabel (Rowlands) live with their young children Tony (Matthew Cassel), Angelo (Matthew Laborteaux), and Maria (Christina Grisanti) in Southern California. After a work emergency scuttles their date night with the kids out of the house, Mabel flirts with stranger Garson Cross (OG Dunn) at a bar and ends up raped by him.
Already less than stable mentally, this sends Mabel into even more of a spiral. Nick tries to deal with his wife’s decline while he also keeps the family together.
To my surprise, this screening of Influence represented my first acquaintance with the Cassavetes filmography – at least behind the camera. I knew him as an actor from films such as 1968’s Rosemary’s Baby but despite awareness of flicks he directed like 1976’s The Killing of a Chinese Bookie, I never viewed any of these flicks until this 2026 Blu-ray.
Does Influence prompt me to want to check out more of the Cassavetes directorial filmography? Not in the least, as it became a chore to endure.
To my surprise, the talented Rowlands becomes a major impediment. Though Cassavetes adopts a naturalistic style to the proceedings and the other actors follow suit, Rowlands goes wholly over the top as Mabel.
I suspect Cassavetes wanted Rowlands to follow this route to make her pathology more obvious. Since everyone else acts in a “normal” fashion, Rowlands’ performance makes Mabel’s mental issues seem more glaring in contrast.
In theory, I get that, but Rowlands goes so far into Nuttyville that she becomes literally laughable. The actor earned – and continues to receive – ample praise for her work but these plaudits absolutely perplex me.
Rowlands makes Mabel an absolute cartoon character. With facial expressions reminiscent of Harpo Marx and a demeanor more at home in a 1930s screwball comedy, Rowlands utterly fails to evoke a believable or compelling character.
Mabel ends up as a one-dimensional version of a person with mental illness. Rowlands doesn’t bring a single note of truth in this shockingly awful performance.
Had Rowlands restrained herself, I’d like Influence more, but its potential remains limited due to its sluggish pace and inherent lack of plot. Granted, a version of Influence that managed to dig into its lead could become involving, but Cassavetes wastes too much time on superfluous and padded scenes.
For instance, we get an extended look at a meal Mabel hosts for Nick and his crew. Although this eventually comes to conflict between Nick and Mabel, it takes far too long to get there.
I get what Cassavetes wanted to do here, and I understand that he felt the desire to subvert standard Hollywood storytelling. In theory, these choices could make Influence feel more realistic.
Instead, Cassavetes’ decisions ultimately highlight the artificial nature of cinema. We end up so bored by these long explorations of nothing that the eventual drama stands out as forced and predictable.
All these extended journeys into monotony mean Influence runs much longer than it should. Cassavetes could easily lose 40 minutes of padding and the film would fare better.
But Influence would continue to suffer from Rowlands’ downright goofy lead performance. Without a grounded main character, the film can’t prosper, so this winds up a slow and silly take on mental illness.