Labyrinth appears in an aspect ratio of approximately 2.35:1 on this single-sided, double-layered DVD; the image has been enhanced for 16X9 televisions. Despite a few small problems, the picture consistently looked excellent.
Sharpness appeared terrific. Virtually the entire movie came across as nicely distinct and accurate. I noticed no issues related to softness or fuzziness during this tight, well-defined presentation.
Jagged edges and moiré effects also created no concerns, and I detected no signs of edge enhancement either. As for print flaws, some light grain cropped up at times, and I also noticed the occasional speckle, but the movie generally looked quite clean and fresh.
The settings in Labyrinth tended to use fairly flat and plain hues - earth
tones abounded - so the film didn’t exhibit an abundance of vivid colors. When those did appear, they most came via costumes donned by the various characters.
The garb worn by participants such as Sir Didymus and the Worm showed tremendously bold and bright colors. This strong reproduction continued into more subdued hues such as the tinted armor of the Goblin warriors toward the end of the film and the leathery clothes of Hoggle; these colors looked absolutely brilliant.
Black levels seemed nicely deep and rich, while shadow detail was appropriately heavy but didn’t appear overly dense. Ultimately, Labyrinth exhibited a very strong visual presentation.
How did the picture quality of the Superbit Labyrinth compare to that of the original DVD that came out in 1999? The pair seemed very similar. Overall, the Superbit edition looked a little smoother and tighter, but not to a tremendous degree.
If I had to pick the better-looking disc of the two, I’d go with the Superbit one, but the old DVD still presented a very solid image.
On the other hand, the audio of the Superbit Labyrinth seemed noticeable stronger than that heard on the original disc. Whereas the prior release only included Dolby Surround 2.0 sound, the Superbit featured both Dolby Digital 5.1 and DTS 5.1 audio.
The pair seemed fairly similar. The DTS track came across as slightly more dynamic and rich, but as a whole, I felt the two were close enough to merit the same “B” grade.
The soundfield presented a fairly active affair. The forward spectrum dominated the mix and offered a good sense of presence. Music showed nice stereo imaging, while effects meshed together well and made the environment come to life pretty solidly. Elements meshed together well, though they seemed a little speaker-specific at times.
The Superbit Labyrinth outdid the original in the activity of the soundfield, especially in regard to the surround channels. These seemed noticeably more involving and distinct. They always came across as somewhat weak and indistinct during the old 2.0 track, but here they became more equal partners. These added to the experience and created a nice feeling of ambience.
Audio quality was somewhat erratic but usually remained solid. Speech mostly came across as reasonably natural and distinct, but some poor dubbing caused a few distractions.
That seemed particularly noticeable early in the film, as the shots between Sarah and her family looked badly looped. A little edginess crept into some of the lines as well, particularly those spoken by Hoggle.
Effects showed a little distortion on a few occasions, but usually those elements came across as nicely detailed and accurate. The effects boasted fairly good clarity as well as decent depth; Ludo’s voice and other loud pieces demonstrated nice bass response.
Music varied a bit, and some of the Bowie songs were a little dense. However, they usually sounded pretty good, and the score appeared fairly rich and vibrant. Overall, the audio of Labyrinth didn’t dazzle me but it seemed good for a film from 1986.
When I compared the Superbit DVD and the old release, the former’s 5.1 audio clearly seemed superior. The old 2.0 track from the original DVD appeared somewhat thin and flat, whereas the 5.1 mixes presented noticeably greater depth and vivacity.
The difference didn’t seem like night and day, but I thought the 5.1 versions gave Labyrinth more life and seemed more involving.
So far the Superbit DVD of Labyrinth appeared to offer stronger picture and sound. Unfortunately, it loses all of the old disc’s old supplements. The original included a documentary along with a few other minor pieces. I don’t miss the latter, but the former was a very solid piece, so its absence creates a definite void.
Labyrinth will never be one of my favorite films, and if it didn’t star my all-time favorite performer, I’d probably never have bothered with it. Still, it has enough going for it that kids should enjoy it. The DVD presents a very solid picture along with fairly good audio, but it omits any supplements.
And there’s the rub when it comes to a recommendation. If you want a copy of Labyrinth on DVD and don’t care about extras, go for the Superbit version. It seemed a little stronger in regard to picture, and its audio came across as noticeably superior.
If you do worry about supplements, I’d probably steer you toward the original disc. Yes, I preferred the sound heard on the Superbit, but the difference wasn’t quite radical enough to make me want to skip that excellent documentary.
That means that folks who already own the original DVD should probably just stick with it. Of course, if you’re a huge Labyrinth fan, it might be worth your while to possess both releases. But for the supplement fan who only wants one of them, I’d recommend the old disc. Still, at least the Superbit version marks a nice improvement over the original, which makes it worth your consideration.