Reviewed by Colin Jacobson (March 18, 2025)
Though not his first movie, 1990’s massive hit Home Alone quickly made Macaulay Culkin a household name. For his next job after that flick’s release, Culkin worked in 1991’s coming of age tale My Girl.
Set in Pennsylvania circa 1972, Harry Sultenfuss (Dan Aykroyd) runs the local funeral parlor. When he hires a new makeup artist, he meets Shelly DeVoto (Jamie Lee Curtis), and the two soon develop a romantic relationship in addition to their professional connection.
Because her mother died in childbirth – and she becomes exposed to corpses on a daily basis – Harry’s 11-year-old daughter Vada (Anna Chlumsky) grows up obsessed with death and hypochondriacal. She also reacts negatively to her father’s situation with Shelly.
You’ll note no mention of Culkin in that synopsis. He portrays Thomas J. Sennett, a nerdy kid with severe allergies and Vada’s BFF.
Culkin plays such a small role in My Girl that I wondered if he agreed to the project before Home Alone erupted. Nope – apparently he signed onto the movie about two months after Home Alone’s release, at which point it’d already made jillions of dollars and endeared Culkin to a wide audience.
Perhaps Culkin’s parents felt it better to take on a supporting part at this point in his career rather than shoot for something bigger. Maybe the leads Culkin got offered didn’t seem like a good fit.
Actually, My Girl didn’t provide Culkin’s first post-Home Alone release, as Only the Lonely arrived in May 1991, about half a year before this film. However, Culkin took on a smaller part in that one and it shot before Home Alone made him a star.
My Girl probably felt like a smart move since it offered a more dramatic film and a character who existed as a contrast to Home Alone’s Kevin. Too bad My Girl doesn’t work as a film.
For the most part, the movie focuses on Vada and brings us a kind of “coming of age” story. Of course, it delivers twists on that theme, mainly due to what an oddball Vada is.
My Girl spends a fair amount of time with Harry and Shelly as well – and probably too much time. The movie feels awkwardly balanced as it hops from Vada’s narrative to the burgeoning adult romance of Harry and Shelly.
I get the impression the filmmakers would prefer to focus on Vada but probably became compelled to pad the Harry/Shelly material to entice “name” actors to join the project. Sure, Culkin enjoyed nascent star power when cast, but I doubt the studio assumed “that kid from Home Alone” was famous enough to draw big crowds.
Chlumsky was a complete unknown, so the suits likely wanted well-known adults to give the project some credibility. Enter Aykroyd and Curtis in roles that should’ve been much smaller.
A little of Harry and Shelly goes a long way, though I don’t mean that their scenes become problematic or annoying. Instead, I simply feel that most of their moments seem superfluous.
My Girl should be about Vada’s journey. She’s the girl in the title and she and Culkin were the subjects of the flick’s posters.
And Vada does occupy most of the flick’s screentime. However, the movie wanders away to pursue Harry and Shelly too often, and that means Vada can get lost in the mix.
All that said, at least Curtis and Aykroyd offer some charm and good performances. Unfortunately, I can’t say the same for Chlumsky.
As she would demonstrate as a regular on Veep, Chlumsky developed into a capable thespian. Unfortunately, as Vada she overacts relentlessly and seems annoying rather than likably quirky.
Culkin does fine as semi-frail Thomas J., though the role doesn’t ask a lot of him. Still, he holds up his end of the bargain.
Since so much of the story revolves around Vada, however, Chlumsky’s clunky performance becomes an issue. She makes it tough to connect to Vada and invest in the role.
Not that a superior turn would do much to redeem this relentlessly gooey confection. My Girl mainly offers cheesy melodrama and lacks an authentic vibe.
Basically the film mixes melodrama and clumsy comedy. Neither side hits the mark, so the movie stumbles along toward its bizarrely neat ‘n’ tidy finale.
When remembered, it seems like most folks recall My Girl for a potentially surprising death scene. No spoilers here, of course, but if this demise comes as a shock to viewers, then they didn’t pay attention.
The movie sets up possible tragedy early and often. The actual death exists just as a cheap excuse to manipulate audience emotions.
To be fair, that goes for the whole movie. While My Girl comes with the potential to deliver an engaging coming of age tale, instead it winds up as a mawkish and contrived dud.